Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

+233 302 522 553
·
info@ladaconsult.com
·
Mon - Fri 09:00-17:00
Get in Touch

Sierra Leone Government Adopts MCC-Supported National Resettlement Policy, the First of Its Kind in Africa

MCC’s Sierra Leone Threshold Program activities included installing new water pipes and water distribution kiosks, like the one pictured above, in the capital city of Freetown.

MCC recently closed the $44.4 million Sierra Leone Threshold Program focused on institutional strengthening and policy reform in the energy, water, and regulatory sectors. One of the threshold’s major activities was a District Metering Area (DMA) and water kiosk installation pilot program, implemented with the Guma Valley Water Company (GVWC), to improve water access. As the pilot involved installing new water pipes and distribution kiosks in densely populated neighborhoods of Freetown, some households and businesses had to relocate to make way for the new infrastructure.

In accordance with MCC’s Environmental Guidelines and IFC Performance Standard 5 on Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement, resettlement refers to situations where people face physical relocation, such as loss of shelter or a home, and economic displacement, such as loss of a job or income because of projects or investments affecting how land is used in a specific area. The threshold team held consultations with key stakeholders in Sierra Leone, including government ministries and local communities to understand resettlement implications on the threshold program. The team found that there was no existing legislation or policy framework on resettlement in Sierra Leone. Historically, when people were required to relocate for projects, the situation was often handled in an inconsistent and haphazard way, with some people being forced out of their homes with no place to go. While the initial plan was to support a resettlement framework for threshold program-related infrastructure, the team soon realized it would be more effective to support the government in developing a nationwide policy. MCC also supported the government to develop an implementation plan for the policy, identifying the ministry that will oversee the policy’s implementation, what kind of staffing and support they would need, and other practicalities.

According to Ansumana Swarray, Water Sector Project Director of the Millennium Challenge Coordinating Unit (MCCU) (MCC’s local partner): “We wanted a policy that is integrated, useful and applicable to all the sectors in Sierra Leone. Before this policy, different sectors developed and used different resettlement policy frameworks, which created some confusion and misunderstanding. For instance, if two or more sectors are working on different development issues, but in the same area, they would have to apply different policy frameworks. This was not helpful to the affected persons.”